Nickname's maps

Elvish_Pillager · Post by **Elvish_Pillager** » September 7th, 2006, 7:42 pm

Baufo wrote:What about a recruit event that modfies the movement cost of chasm to 99 for every unit?

That would work. Remember to do it for leaders as well.

Nickname · Post by **Nickname** » September 9th, 2006, 7:54 pm

Elvish Pillager wrote:Use deep water. That way flyers are fairly balanced with water guys (I think...)

Just so you know, I actually liked this, and have deep water in the actual map now.

Nickname · Post by **Nickname** » September 11th, 2006, 8:22 pm

[map]WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
WWWWccWWWfvkWWWWWWWW
WWWogfccWmhkZcWWWWWW
WW2ggghgkkkncghWWWWW
WWoggYggfDhfk?hWWWWW
WcghgkKuuWuukkWWWWWW
WWccfkhuWlWufkccWWWW
WWWWckfuWWWuhkfhccWW
WWWWW?kfuDug1YgggWWW
WWWWhgknhkfgggggoWWW
WWWWhcckkmkchfgoKWWW
WWWWWWZkhfWWccgWWWWW
WWWWWWWWvWWWWWcWWWWW
WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
[/map]

JW · Post by JW » September 11th, 2006, 8:34 pm

That's a unique way to give P1 less of a startign advantage!!!

Post by **Baufo** » September 11th, 2006, 8:47 pm

JW wrote:That's a unique way to give P1 less of a startign advantage!!!

But a really cool way! I like it. I actually love it! Great idea

Website · Post by **Sapient** » September 12th, 2006, 1:04 am

It's a nice idea but it doesn't add up. If we assume that P1 has an advantage at grabbing central position/villages, this countermeasure is not enough of a penalty. But if P1 does *not* have an advantage at grabbing central position/villages, then this measure is an unnecessary hindrance benefiting P2.