Problems with [have_unit] on unit placed event

The place to post your WML questions and answers.

Moderator: Forum Moderators

Forum rules
  • Please use [code] BBCode tags in your posts for embedding WML snippets.
  • To keep your code readable so that others can easily help you, make sure to indent it following our conventions.
vghetto
Posts: 755
Joined: November 2nd, 2019, 5:12 pm

Re: Problems with [have_unit] on unit placed event

Post by vghetto »

Nyanyanyan wrote: October 14th, 2020, 2:05 pm That's just for filtering purposes and I'm pretty sure it does carry over, at least I haven't seen a situation in which it doesn't.
Thanks I did not know that. I've been using variables (as booleans) to do pretty much the same thing this entire time :doh:
Filtering on a status seems straight forward too. [filter] status=general [/filter] and [filter] [not]status=general[/not] [/filter]
Post Reply