Elvish Pillager wrote:(largefoot movement costs, though.)
yup, there's mountain movement.
Moderators: Forum Moderators, Developers
Elvish Pillager wrote:(largefoot movement costs, though.)
Elvish Pillager wrote:No, it isn't. This is a new unit and I can use the name 'chimaera' for whatever I please. The original Chimaera doesn't fly, breathes fire, and doesn't have any teleportation powers, either. I always thought the name 'chimaera' would be more suited to a cute little bird-thingy.
emdot wrote:You are ruining game for at least literate users, who now what 'chimaera' is and are expecting something. If you are creating new creature, create new name.
Elvish Pillager wrote:emdot wrote:You are ruining game for at least literate users, who now what 'chimaera' is and are expecting something. If you are creating new creature, create new name.
Cockatrice is the same way... as is 'dragon' and 'drake'... and even 'elf' and 'orc'. Who cares if our Chimaera is different from some other Chimaera someone has heard of?
jp30 wrote:I really like the idea of your creature, though - teleportation needs to be better used in wesnoth. Having criticised the name, I feel obliged to make a positive proposal: your creature is rather reminiscent of nethack's tengu. Maybe we could call it a tengu?
scott wrote:That's like saying a Pegasus in BFW is a 5-legged lizard just because you want to do it that way. It's weird, which is reason enough not to do so.
Greek Mythology wrote:Fire-breathing monster slain by the hero Bellerophon; related to Cerberus and the Hydra. The Chimaera was part lion, part goat and part snake, although accounts differed as to how these parts were assembled. King Iobates of Lycia sent Bellerophon after the beast in the expectation that the hero would never return. But with the help of the gods and the flying horse Pegasus, Bellerophon rid Lycia of its multiple monster.
jp30 wrote:Elvish Pillager wrote:emdot wrote:You are ruining game for at least literate users, who now what 'chimaera' is and are expecting something. If you are creating new creature, create new name.
Cockatrice is the same way... as is 'dragon' and 'drake'... and even 'elf' and 'orc'. Who cares if our Chimaera is different from some other Chimaera someone has heard of?
I'm with emdot on this one. It's really central to the concept of the chimera in classical mythology that it's a bizarre and implausible mixture of parts of different animals. No-one has ever used "chimera" except in that sense, or one derived from it.
I really like the idea of your creature, though - teleportation needs to be better used in wesnoth. Having criticised the name, I feel obliged to make a positive proposal: your creature is rather reminiscent of nethack's tengu. Maybe we could call it a tengu?
jp30 wrote:This sort of debate happenned before over the drakes, back when they were called the "draconians", and I think the right thing resulted then. If we think hard enough we can think of a name that sounds great and isn't a crime against etymology.
Jetryl wrote:yet another abomination of this stupid fricken greek mythology
Jetryl wrote:I agree with respecting traditional uses of a slightly obscure word when it describes a cool idea, however, the chimera was another retarded, "slap a bunch of parts together and call it a mythical beast". I see no reason to respect that -
Caçada Selvagem wrote:Everyone thinks dragons are normal, but they don't realize that they are giant lizards with wings and spit fire.
Return to Faction & Era Development
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests