jp30 wrote:
Elvish Pillager wrote:
emdot wrote:
You are ruining game for at least literate users, who now what 'chimaera' is and are expecting something. If you are creating new creature, create new name.
Cockatrice is the same way... as is 'dragon' and 'drake'... and even 'elf' and 'orc'. Who cares if our Chimaera is different from some other Chimaera someone has heard of?
I'm with emdot on this one. It's really central to the concept of the chimera in classical mythology that it's a bizarre and implausible mixture of parts of different animals. No-one has ever used "chimera" except in that sense, or one derived from it.
I really like the idea of your creature, though - teleportation needs to be better used in wesnoth. Having criticised the name, I feel obliged to make a positive proposal: your creature is rather reminiscent of nethack's tengu. Maybe we could call it a tengu?
Tengu were intelligent, speaking creatures who even wore clothes. They feature in at least one japanese legend, wherein they are many in number, and have their own names, and identities, and skills. This also looks nothing like a tengu. They had a very specific look, with these strange masks they would wear over their faces.
jp30 wrote:
This sort of debate happenned before over the drakes, back when they were called the "draconians", and I think the right thing resulted then. If we think hard enough we can think of a name that sounds great and isn't a crime against etymology.
I disagree wholeheartedly. We're stealing back this word, in the same way that tolkien stole back the word elf, and cleanly separated it from what it was usually used to describe. Most of what people used to call elves are now known as gnomes, or goblins, or faeries.
I agree with respecting traditional uses of a slightly obscure word when it describes a cool idea, however, the chimera was another retarded, "slap a bunch of parts together and call it a mythical beast". I see no reason to respect
that - yet another abomination of this stupid fricken greek mythology. Moreover, it was (again, impossibly enough) a single creature, the only one of its kind.
Chimera has been used in many places to describe strange and unusual creatures. In warcraft III, it was used very well to describe the two-headed, lighting breathing dragons that inhabited Ashenvale.
In Cythera, it was used to describe a creature wholly dissociate from reality, and not bound by physical form. It is interesting to note that in Cythera, the default name for the main character was Bellepheron.
-------
One of the other things to consider is that many mythological creatures were spawned from strange encounters with real animals, or encounters with the corpses of real animals.
Just as the skulls of elephants spawned the mythos of the Cyclops, perhaps we should speculate upon what would spawn the mythos of the chimera?
I would find the teleportation ability appropriate to a chimera, however the backstab would seem more appropriate to something like a harpy. Hell, we could call it a harpy. Make it indistinct enough that one cannot be sure if it quite looks like one, and it would be appropriate to the part. It's a much better fit than calling it the Tengu.